YUKOS case personalia

  • YUKOS case
  • Accusation
  • Defence
  • First trial
  • Second trial

  • Portal Human rights in Russia
    Portal Human rights in Russia Sovest (conscience)  support group for Michail Khodorkovsky
    Sovest (conscience) support group for Michail Khodorkovsky

    Alexey Pichugin case in Live Journal
    Alexey Pichugin case in Live Journal

    Novaya gazeta
    Novaya gazeta

    Echo of Moscow
    Radio station Echo of Moscow

    Live Journal Community of Svetlana Bakhmina support committee

    Herald Civitas

    Our banner Alexey Pichugin case

    22 May 2006 session | 22 May 2006

    Moscow municipal courtAt the session held on 22 May 2006 examination of witnesses for prosecution continued. Former adviser of „YUKOS“ Gennady Piskaryov, former security service employee of the oil company Michael Balushkin, and former colleagues of entrepreneur Eugenie Ribin made statements. The latter, let us remind, previously testified that in 1998 and 1999 his life was attempted twice.

    In response to the judges question Mr. Piskaryov said that he is not acquainted with none of the accused. Then he told that shortly before his discharge from „YUKOS“ in June 1998 he was send on a business trip by Nevslin and Shahnovsky to Nefteugansk for evaluation of state of companys affairs in the region. In particular, according to Piskaryov, here was a conflict between „YUKOS“ governing body and the mayor of Nefteugansk Petukov because of „partial payments of taxes“ made by the company to the city budget. In response to the lawyers qualifying question Piskaryov explained that he did not familiarize himself with the tax reports of „YUKOS“ and drew conclusions about the tax arrears from analytical notes based on mass media publications that were presented to him.

    On 26th of June 1998, the next day after the arrival in Nefteugansk Piskaryov learned about assassination of mayor of the city. With reference to untried rumors circulating in public the witness relates this crime to „YUKOS“ and calls it „a gift presented to Hodorkovsky on his Birthday“. Even if we admit the wild assumption about the „gift“ as a release version, it is still unclear why in this case the company sent Piskaryov on a business trip to Nefteugansk to look for ways of solution of the conflict with the mayor.

    Having returned from Nefteugansk Piskaryov presented to his direction the report about the trip. According to the adviser, the report criticizing the current work of security service caused discontent that was the alleged reason for his discharge.

    Eugenie Ribins colleagues told about two attempts on his life (and the court proceeding between Ribins company East Petroleum and „YUKOS“ in the course of which Ribin failed to prove validity of his claims). Though those people themselves were not witnesses of these crimes and knew about them from the other people, including Ribin himself. They call Leonid Nevzlin mastermind of the attempt. 

    The witness Andrei Smetkin who fulfilled the guarding of the route of entrepreneurs automobile reported to the court that the day of the second attempt (in 1999) he checked the documents of the driver of light color „Niva“ that was parked not far from Volokolamskoe cemetery and attracted Smetkins interest. As it turned out, the documents were processed for the name of Federal Security Service major Shevtsov. Now in the court the witness recognized the person he saw in the accused Tsigelnik. 

    Another witness, security service employee initially employed by „MENATEP“ and later by „YUKOS“ Michael Balushkin told that he executed the lease of some of the companys automobiles for his name (he does not remember how many, he specifies only the colors of the cars  silver and black),  though he did not use them. He knows Aleksey Pichugin by sight but not in person.

    Except the witnesses statements the extracts from the case papers related to Gorins disappearance were cited in the session.

  • 14 years behind bars without fair trial. What did Strasbourg rule in the case of Pichugin?
  • Zoya Svetova: Who is it, Mikhail Savitsky, conducting an interrogation of Aleksey Pichugin
  • Alexey Pichugin: «I wrote a motion to have a visit from my mother»
  • Statement of Igor Viacheslavovuch Sutyagin
  • Mikhail Khodorkovsky: «An innnocent man, Alexey Pichugin, is still behind bars»
  • The European Court of Human Rights. CASE OF PICHUGIN v. RUSSIA. Judgment
  • Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger about Alexey Pichugin case
  • Leonid Nevzlins interview about the «case»
  • The «Amnesty International» is anxious about Alexey Pichugins condition

  • Trial of vengeance

  • Journalist Valeriy Shiryaev on the first case of Aleksey Pichugin in his book «Trial of vengeance. The first victim of the YUKOS case»